<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Feature: Photos of Bible Places</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Amburose</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/comment-page-1/#comment-36411</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Amburose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/#comment-36411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m very happy to see the Biblical places.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very happy to see the Biblical places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/comment-page-1/#comment-5663</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/#comment-5663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For reasons i don&#039;t fully understand (but maybe you do), my Firefox rendering of these pages doesn&#039;t include the photos, but the IE version does. At first i was just scratching my head: what photos? Then i looked in IE and saw them. No obvious clues in the source view, but maybe there&#039;s some browser-specif difference in how the pages are rendered?

Just FYI (i know how to find them now).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reasons i don&#8217;t fully understand (but maybe you do), my Firefox rendering of these pages doesn&#8217;t include the photos, but the IE version does. At first i was just scratching my head: what photos? Then i looked in IE and saw them. No obvious clues in the source view, but maybe there&#8217;s some browser-specif difference in how the pages are rendered?</p>
<p>Just FYI (i know how to find them now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
