<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Feature: Photos of Bible Places</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/#comment-5663</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2007/12/new-feature-photos-of-bible-places/#comment-5663</guid>
		<description>For reasons i don't fully understand (but maybe you do), my Firefox rendering of these pages doesn't include the photos, but the IE version does. At first i was just scratching my head: what photos? Then i looked in IE and saw them. No obvious clues in the source view, but maybe there's some browser-specif difference in how the pages are rendered?

Just FYI (i know how to find them now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reasons i don&#8217;t fully understand (but maybe you do), my Firefox rendering of these pages doesn&#8217;t include the photos, but the IE version does. At first i was just scratching my head: what photos? Then i looked in IE and saw them. No obvious clues in the source view, but maybe there&#8217;s some browser-specif difference in how the pages are rendered?</p>
<p>Just FYI (i know how to find them now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
