<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo!, Bibleref, and RDFa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogos - God&#8217;s Word &#124; our words &#124; meaning, communication, &#38; technology &#124; following Jesus, the Word made flesh &#187; Bibleref and RDFa</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-8163</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogos - God&#8217;s Word &#124; our words &#124; meaning, communication, &#38; technology &#124; following Jesus, the Word made flesh &#187; Bibleref and RDFa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-8163</guid>
		<description>[...] and RDFa    There&#8217;s a thoughtful post at OpenBible.info about Bibleref and an emerging W3C standard called RDFa which provides another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and RDFa    There&#8217;s a thoughtful post at OpenBible.info about Bibleref and an emerging W3C standard called RDFa which provides another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-8137</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-8137</guid>
		<description>Please join the new RDFa mailing list [1] and post the above question. I have talked to a number of the task force and they are keen to help out. Both publicly via the list and privately if necessary.

Cheers,

David Peterson
(foaf) http://data.boab.info/david/foaf.rdf
(blog) http://www.sitepoint.com/articlelist/497

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please join the new RDFa mailing list [1] and post the above question. I have talked to a number of the task force and they are keen to help out. Both publicly via the list and privately if necessary.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>David Peterson<br />
(foaf) <a href="http://data.boab.info/david/foaf.rdf" rel="nofollow">http://data.boab.info/david/foaf.rdf</a><br />
(blog) <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/articlelist/497" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/articlelist/497</a></p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa/" rel="nofollow">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>Microformats versus RDFa has long been an academic discussion, but if RDFa is proving to be easier to implement and therefore actually used by Yahoo!, it stands to reason that RDFa should prevail as the format for Bibleref. Open standards are always great, but only the ones that have a useful purpose are worth pursuing. Great job on the site, by the way. I just found this from David Peterson's article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microformats versus RDFa has long been an academic discussion, but if RDFa is proving to be easier to implement and therefore actually used by Yahoo!, it stands to reason that RDFa should prevail as the format for Bibleref. Open standards are always great, but only the ones that have a useful purpose are worth pursuing. Great job on the site, by the way. I just found this from David Peterson&#8217;s article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines</title>
		<link>http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-7962</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbible.info/blog/2008/03/yahoo-bibleref-and-rdfa/#comment-7962</guid>
		<description>[...] was going to write this post in a few days, but a post on OpenBible.info has forced my hand &#8212; thanks for that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was going to write this post in a few days, but a post on OpenBible.info has forced my hand &#8212; thanks for that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
