Places in the Bible Today:

En-haddah

Data

Translated NamesEn-haddah, En Haddah
Typesettlement
Notesalso see Beth-pazzez
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

3 Possible Identifications

  1. Hadita (modern): 70% confidence
    1. satellite view of the region around HaditaHadita

  2. El Karm (modern): less than 10% confidence
    1. satellite view of the region around El KarmEl Karm

  3. Khirbet Judeida (modern): less than 10% confidence
    1. panorama including Khirbet Judeida, which is down the hill by the switchbacksKhirbet Judeida

Verses (1)

Josh 19:21

Linked Data Identifiers

SourceIdentifier
Logos FactbookEn-haddah
OpenBible.info (2007)En-haddah
OpenBible.infoa009e7d (En-haddah)
TIPNREn-haddah@Jos.19.21
UBS Names Databaseot ID_2208
WikipediaEn-haddah (redirect)

Sources

  1. Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 434
  2. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): En-haddah (place)
  3. Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): En Haddah
  4. Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): En-haddah
  5. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  6. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): En-Haddah
  7. Expositor’s Bible Commentary (1984): Josh 19:21
  8. HarperCollins Concise Atlas of the Bible (1991)
  9. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
  10. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): En-Haddah
  11. New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988): En-haddah
  12. Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): En-haddah
  13. Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): En-haddah
  14. Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): En-haddah
  15. Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
  16. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identifications is changing over time. Each dot (conneceted by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others (in this case, Hadita), then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019, דוד בר

About

This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain. It's best to think about the confidences in relative rather than absolute terms. Often they reflect different schools of thought, each confident in their identifications.