Places in the Bible Today:

Cuth

Data

Translated NamesCush, Cuth, Cuthah, Kuthah
Typesettlement
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

1 Identification

  1. Tell Ibrahim (modern): 85% confidence
    1. drawing of a god worshiped at Tell IbrahimTell Ibrahim

Verses (2)

2Kgs 17:24, 17:30

Linked Data Identifiers

SourceIdentifier
Logos FactbookCuth
OpenBible.info (2007)Cuth, Cuthah
OpenBible.infoa538831 (Cuth)
Pleiades893977
TIPNRCuth@2Ki.17.30
UBS Names Databaseot ID_1540, ot ID_1541
WikidataQ1096108

Sources

  1. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Cuth (place)
  2. Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land (1990): Cuthah; Cuth
  3. Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Kuth, Kuthah
  4. Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Cuthah
  5. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  6. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Cuthah
  7. ESV Bible Atlas (2010)
  8. Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Cuth
  9. Hammond Atlas of the Bible Lands (2007): Cuthah
  10. HarperCollins Concise Atlas of the Bible (1991)
  11. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Cuthah
  12. IVP Atlas of Bible History (2006): Cuthah
  13. IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): 2Kgs 17:24
  14. Lexham Bible Dictionary (2016): Cuth
  15. New Bible Dictionary (1996): Cuth, Cuthah
  16. New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
  17. New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988)
  18. Oxford Bible Atlas, Fourth Edition (2007)
  19. Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Cuth
  20. Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Cuth, Cuthah
  21. Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Cuthah
  22. Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Cuth
  23. Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
  24. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
  25. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): 2Kgs 17:24

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (conneceted by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Babel and Bible

About

This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.