Places in the Bible Today:



Translated NamesBeth-peor, Beth Peor
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

3 Possible Identifications

  1. Khirbet Ayun Musa (modern): 25% confidence
    1. panorama of ruins at Khirbet Ayun MusaKhirbet Ayun Musa

  2. Khirbet el Muhatta (modern): 25% confidence
    1. satellite view of the region around Khirbet el MuhattaKhirbet el Muhatta

  3. Tall Iktanu (modern): less than 10% confidence
    1. satellite view of the region around Tall IktanuTall Iktanu

Verses (4)

Gen-Deut (3)
Deut 3:29, 4:46, 34:6
Josh-Ruth (1)
Josh 13:20

Linked Data Identifiers

Logos FactbookBeth-peor (2007)Beth-peor
OpenBible.infoaf3ce34 (Beth-peor)
UBS Names Databaseot ID_509
WikipediaBeth Peor (redirect)


  1. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Beth-peor (place)
  2. Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Baal-peor; Beth-peor
  3. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  4. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Beth-Peor
  5. Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Beth-peor
  6. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
  7. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Beth-Peor
  8. IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Deut 3:17
  9. Oxford Bible Atlas, Fourth Edition (2007)
  10. Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Beth-peor
  11. Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
  12. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
  13. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): Deut 3:29

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identifications is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Osama Shukir Muhammed Amin FRCP(Glasg), Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019


This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain. It's best to think about the confidences in relative rather than absolute terms. Often they reflect different schools of thought, each confident in their identifications.