Places in the Bible Today:



Translated NamesDi-zahab, Di Zahab, Dizahab
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

3 Possible Identifications

  1. Ad Duhaybah (modern): 35% confidence
    1. satellite view of the region around Ad DuhaybahAd Duhaybah

  2. another name for Mezahab (ancient): less than 10% confidence
  3. Dahab (modern): less than 10% confidence
    1. cityscape of DahabDahab

Verses (1)

Deut 1:1

Linked Data Identifiers

Logos FactbookDizahab (2007)Dizahab
OpenBible.infoafcb77d (Dizahab)
UBS Names Databaseot ID_809


  1. Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 433
  2. Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Dizahab (place)
  3. Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
  4. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Dizahab
  5. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
  6. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Dizahab
  7. New Bible Dictionary (1996): Dizahab
  8. New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
  9. New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988): Dizahab
  10. Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Dizahab
  11. Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
  12. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identifications is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019, Nowic


This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain. It's best to think about the confidences in relative rather than absolute terms. Often they reflect different schools of thought, each confident in their identifications.